ArticleVaccine2025
An efficient vaccine clinical trial: ACTG A5379 hepatitis B vaccine trial in persons with HIV.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04193189 (B-Enhancement of HBV Vaccination in Persons Living With HIV), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
B-Enhancement of HBV Vaccination in Persons Living With HIV (BEe-HIVe): Evaluation of HEPLISAV-B
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brief Report: Hepatitis B Vaccination Histories in Persons With HIV Needing Revaccination.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical trial designs that address multiple questions more efficiently are desirable. When we designed a hepatitis B vaccine trial to assess seroprotective outcomes in persons with HIV (PWH), we aimed for an efficient design that addressed three primary objectives in two study populations. The study focused on: PWH who did not respond to prior HBV vaccination, and PWH with no known history of HBV vaccination. Whereas one vaccine regimen was studied in the vaccine-naïve participants, multiple interventions were considered for those with prior nonresponse, with two different vaccines and two dosing schedules. Several features of the trial design required statistical considerations related to multiple testing: (1) assessment of vaccine response in two study populations under one trial, (2) comparisons among multiple treatment arms, and (3) sequential repeated significance tests in interim data monitoring. We describe the features aimed to gain statistical and administrative efficiencies, including reduction in the study sample size of 12 %. We also describe how we controlled type I error and planned interim data monitoring, and highlight the time lag issue due to the laboratory-based immunogenicity endpoint in this international, multi-center trial (NCT04193189).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.