ArticleSchizophrenia research2025
Forging a learning health system for early psychosis: Insights from the academic community EPINET.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to patient and public involvement in developing learning health systems within community health services: ascoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Available guidance for ethical challenges in learning health systems: an integrative literature review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Review
- Psychiatric Hospitalization After Enrollment in Coordinated Specialty Care: Unexpected Gender- and Age-Related Disparities.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Psychiatric Hospitalization After Enrollment in Coordinated Specialty Care: Unexpected Gender and Age Related Disparities.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Utilization of a psychosis consultation service: Early lessons from a statewide initiative.Schizophrenia research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychosis can lead to deleterious outcomes with multifaceted personal and societal costs, but the provision of intervention services early in the illness course positively influences disease trajectory. There has been a growing emphasis on innovation and expansion of first episode services (FES). Yet, such care has not universally delivered on the promise of meeting the needs of individuals with first-episode psychosis. The Academic Community Early Psychosis Intervention Network (AC-EPINET) is one of eight regional hubs envisioned by NIH to function as a learning healthcare system (LHS) to advance the quality of early intervention care. AC-EPINET spans three geographically distinct areas of the U.S. (Midwest: Indiana, Michigan, Ohio; Southeastern: Tennessee, Louisiana; and Northeastern: Connecticut, New York) with six academically oriented, community-facing FES' and an informatics site. Our goals were to strengthen existing services, expand them to collect common data elements within clinical workflows, leverage informatics, support practice-based research, and engage stakeholders to ultimately build a culture of continuous learning and quality improvement. We designed and implemented an infrastructure consisting of a centralized two-site administrative team supporting an inclusive steering committee, three work groups, and the six clinical sites. Common data capture at enrollment and consecutive six-month intervals was integrated into clinical workflows. An informatics workflow that included evidence-based benchmarked outcome visualization, for each site and across the entire network, was designed and deployed to enable shared learning and ongoing quality improvement efforts. Design and implementation lessons presented are relevant to LHS development and dissemination of FES quality improvement and research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.