Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146986›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Use of Mukbang in Health Promotion: Scoping Review.

Xiao Wang, Yuxue Xiao, Sujin Nam, Ting Zhong, Dongyan Tang, William Ho Cheung Li, Peige Song, Wei Xia

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao WangSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-6991
Yuxue XiaoSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6616-5434
Sujin NamCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-5202
Ting ZhongSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8780-4895
Dongyan TangSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-3599
William Ho Cheung LiNethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-769X
Peige SongSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0196-9759
Wei XiaSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-7695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMukbang is a recent internet phenomenon in which anchors publicly record and show their eating through short video platforms. Researchers reported a tangible impact of mukbang on the psychological and physical health, appetite, and eating behavior of the public, it is critical to obtain clear and comprehensive insights concerning the use of mukbang to promote the viewers' appetite, eating behaviors, and health to identify directions for future work.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to comprehensively outline the current evidence regarding the impact of mukbang consumption on dietary behaviors, appetite regulation, flavor perception, and physical and psychological well-being. Specifically, we conducted an analysis of public perceptions and attitudes toward mukbang while summarizing the reciprocal influence it has on health promotion.

methodsThis study was conducted as a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. We comprehensively searched 8 electronic databases in Chinese, English, and Korean languages. We also searched gray literature sources like Google Scholar and ProQuest. We used a data extraction chart to extract information relevant to the impact of mukbang on health. The extracted data were qualitatively analyzed to form different themes related to health, categorizing and integrating the results based on the type of study (qualitative, observational, and experimental).

resultsThis scoping review finally included 53 studies; the annual distribution exhibited a consistent upward trend across all categories since their initial publication in 2017. Based on the results of the analysis, we have summarized 4 themes, which showed that mukbang may have positive effects on viewers' appetite, food choices, and weight control; it can also meet the psychological needs of viewers and provide digital companionship and happiness. However, excessive viewing may also be harmful to viewer's health, which has also caused health concerns for some viewers.

conclusionsThis study conducted a comprehensive search, screening, and synthesis of existing studies focusing on mukbang and health across various languages and varying levels of quality, which has presented the analytical evidence of the relationship between mukbang and dietary behaviors, appetite, flavor perception, and health. According to the results, future research could consider analyzing the beneficial and harmful factors of mukbang, thereby further optimizing the existing mukbang videos accordingly to explore the potential of using mukbang for health intervention or promotion, so as to improve or customize the content of mukbang based on this scoping review, maximize the appetite and health promotion effects of mukbang videos.

trial registrationINPLASY INPLASY2022120109; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-12-0109/.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth PromotionInternetAppetiteHumansappetiteeating behaviorshealth promotionmukbangscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40146986
PMCPMC11986381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.