ArticleACS nano2025
Coupling of Nondegenerate Topological Modes in Nitrogen Core-Doped Graphene Nanoribbons.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Topological Junction States in Graphene Nanoribbons: A Route to Topological Chemistry.Nano letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nitrogen core-doping of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) allows trigonal planar carbon atoms along the backbone of GNRs to be substituted by higher-valency nitrogen atoms. The excess valence electrons are injected into the π-orbital system of the GNR, thereby changing not only its electronic occupation but also its topological properties. We have observed this topological change by synthesizing dilute nitrogen core-doped armchair GNRs with a width of five atoms (N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.