Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A simple validation and screening method for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in mouse embryos to facilitate genetically modified mice production.

Dawid Winiarczyk, Hossein Khodadadi, Paweł Leszczyński, Hiroaki Taniguchi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. In Vitro Hatching ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawid WiniarczykDepartment of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland.
Hossein KhodadadiDepartment of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-487X
Paweł LeszczyńskiDepartment of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-248X
Hiroaki TaniguchiDepartment of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-390X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) is a genome engineering method for generating site-specific editing in target genes in a variety of species. It is a common tool for generating mouse models of different diseases. However, detecting target modifications in mouse embryos can be time-consuming and expensive. Accordingly, developing a screening method to confirm gene modification may be useful. We propose herein an evaluation method (cleavage assay - CA) for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in preimplantation mouse embryos that allows us to detect mutants efficiently and later on initiate in vivo production without the extensive number of samples needing to be sent for Sanger sequencing and animal usage. Our method is based on the inability of the RNP complex to recognize the target sequence after CRISPR-mediated genome editing due to modification of the target locus. It allows us to establish gene edited mice in a user-friendly fashion with a limited number of mice usage by confirming each step of CRISPR-mediated gene editing of mouse embryos and, therefore, can be considered as a supportive tool to existing procedures for verification of successful CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene alterations in mouse embryos and further mutant production.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEmbryo, MammalianGene EditingAnimalsBlastocystFemaleMiceMice, Transgenic

Identifiers

PMID40146761
PMCPMC11949363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.