ArticlePloS one2025
Exploratory analysis of poultry workers' knowledge and practices Regarding highly pathogenic avian influenza in Guinea.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-continental spillover risk: integrated spatiotemporal, transmissibility and surveillance analysis of avian influenza a(H5N1) in Africa.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward avian influenza among free-grazing duck farmers in Central Thailand: An analytical cross-sectional study.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Highly pathogenic avian influenza: a One Health perspective on risks, surveillance, and resilience.ImmunoHorizons · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2022-2023, Guinea experienced a major avian influenza epizootic, leading to significant economic losses and increasing the risk of transmission to humans. Raising awareness and promoting protective behaviour among the general population, particularly high-risk groups, could help strengthen prevention and control measures for this zoonosis. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices related to avian influenza among poultry workers in Guinea.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2023 on poultry farms in Coyah and Forecariah, Guinea prefectures. A survey was administered to all poultry farms in these two prefectures. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which included the following variables: socio-demographic and professional profile of respondents, avian influenza information, sources of information, and a series of questions to assess their knowledge and practices. Knowledge and practice scores were then calculated. The cumulative local effects method was used to assess the influence and contribution of each co-variate to changes in the probability of knowledge and practice levels among poultry farm staff.
resultsA total of 326 poultry workers participated in the survey, including poulterers (62.3%), managers (17.5%), and poultry technicians (13.8%). More than half of these workers (54.9%) had heard of influenza avian. Their primary sources of information were health workers (27.9%), friends and fellow farmers (23.3%) and employees (22.7%). Overall, the knowledge of avian influenza was relatively low among poultry workers (42.9%), and the majority (68.4%) demonstrated poor practices on poultry farms. Analysis using the ALE model reveals that age, education and type of occupation are significantly associated with knowledge. At the same time, the number of farms managed, the number of hours worked, and gender are associated considerably with practices among these workers.
conclusionThe study revealed a low level of knowledge and poor practices among poultry farm workers despite an avian flu epizootic. These findings suggest the need for a targeted strategy to prevent the risk of virus transmission to humans, including awareness-raising, training, and providing personal protective equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.