Trial reportSexual health2025
A digital citizen science intervention to reduce HIV stigma and promote HIV testing: a randomized clinical trial among adolescents and young adults in Kazakhstan.
Trial report in Sexual health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Media Messaging to Reduce HIV-Related Stigma Among Young Adults in Peru: A Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Trial
- Fostering innovation and building youth capacity in global health: design, implementation, and evaluation of a youth-led digital health hackathon.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
64 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Kazakhstan has a high HIV incidence among adolescents and young adults (AYA), and high HIV stigma contributing to low HIV testing uptake. We examined whether an AYA-developed digital crowdsourced intervention reduced HIV stigma compared with conventional public health materials among AYA in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Methods A total of 216 AYA (females:116/males:110) aged 16-24 years were recruited to the online study cohort and randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control arm. AYA were exposed to the crowdsourced intervention or control materials once a week for 5weeks, with equivalent exposures between arms. Outcomes included a total HIV stigma score assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 2months post-intervention from January to August 2023. We conducted multilevel mixed models to compare changes over time by arm and sex. Results AYA in the intervention arm had significantly lower HIV testing stigma 2months post-intervention (adjusted mean change (AMC): -0.73 (-1.07, -0.39)) than AYA in the control arm (AMC: -0.06 (-0.42, 0.30); P =0.032). Female AYA in the intervention arm had significantly lower total HIV stigma immediately post-intervention (AMC: -4.91 (-7.25, -2.58)) and 2months post-intervention (AMC: -5.16 (-7.48, -2.84)) than females in the control arm (immediately post-intervention AMC: -0.03 (-2.63, 2.57) and 2-months post-intervention AMC: -0.07 (-2.70, 2.56); P =0.012, P =0.012). Conclusions The AYA-developed crowdsourced intervention decreased HIV testing stigma, although this effect was moderated by sex, and decreased total HIV stigma among female AYA. Crowdsourced interventions may be a promising way to engage communities to develop interventions to decrease HIV stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.