ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Stacking Interactions of Druglike Heterocycles with Nucleobases.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico designing of small molecules for targeting RNA: current landscape and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Structural Pockets and Interacting RNA-Associated Ligands (SPIRAL): A DSSR-enabled Meta-Analysis of RNA-Small Molecule Recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bioactivity Classification of 2,649 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) via Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Molecular Docking to Health-Relevant Proteins.Environmental science & technology letters · 2026Article
- Streamlined Fragment-Based Discovery Platform for Targeting Structured RNAs.ACS chemical biology · 2025Article
- Making Sense of Heteroatom Effects in π-π Interactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Hunter-Sanders Model for π-π Interactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stacking interactions contribute significantly to the interaction of small molecules with RNA, and harnessing the power of these interactions will likely prove important in the development of RNA-targeting inhibitors. To this end, we present a comprehensive computational analysis of stacking interactions between a set of 54 druglike heterocycles and the natural nucleobases. We first show that heterocycle choice can tune the strength of stacking interactions with nucleobases over a large range and that heterocycles favor stacked geometries that cluster around a discrete set of stacking loci characteristic of each nucleobase. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory results indicate that the strengths of these interactions are modulated primarily by electrostatic and dispersion effects. Based on this, we present a multivariate predictive model of the maximum strength of stacking interactions between a given heterocycle and nucleobase that depends on molecular descriptors derived from the electrostatic potential. These descriptors can be readily computed using density functional theory or predicted directly from atom connectivity (e.g., SMILES). This model is used to predict the maximum possible stacking interactions of a set of 1854 druglike heterocycles with the natural nucleobases. Finally, we show that trivial modifications of standard (fixed-charge) molecular mechanics force fields reduce errors in predicted stacking interaction energies from around 2 kcal/mol to below 1 kcal/mol, providing a pragmatic means of predicting more reliable stacking interaction energies using existing computational workflows. We also analyze the stacking interactions between ribocil and a bacterial riboswitch, showing that two of the three aromatic heterocyclic components engage in near-optimal stacking interactions with binding site nucleobases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.