ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Equal access, unequal outcomes? racial disparities in mortality between black and white women with breast cancer: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study uses systematic review and meta-analysis to address whether the significant disparities in breast cancer (BC) related health outcomes between Black and White women in the U.S. exist for women treated in the equal access Military Health System (MHS).
methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched using PRISMA guidelines in February-March 2024 for articles published between 2014-2024 containing quantitative mortality outcomes for Black and White women with BC treated in the MHS. Summarized mortality risk was computed using random effects meta-analysis from 2 × 2 tables of total deaths and population. Search, study selection, and quality assessment were completed by two independent co-authors.
resultsSix studies with samples ranging from 395 to 28,818 across 31 years of data were included, and their mortality findings synthesized. Compared to matched patients in the general population, both Black and White women treated in the MHS had reduced mortality risk in two studies. While unadjusted mortality risk varied across three studies with direct comparisons between Black and White women treated in the MHS, adjusting for demographic and cancer characteristics eliminated significant differences. Meta-analysis of all six studies revealed a higher pooled unadjusted mortality risk for Black compared to White women (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09-1.33).
conclusionsEqual access to health care alone may not eliminate racial disparities in mortality for patients with BC. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Improving access, in combination with other targeted interventions, may reduce disparities in health outcomes for women with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40146478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.