ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Evaluating ΔMTV%, ΔD
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic role of maximum tumor dissemination derived by PET/CT in oncological diseases: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A Lesion-adaptive Segmentation Approach for Tumor Delineation on FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Inter-reader agreement of quantitative FDG PET/CT biomarkers in lymphoma: a multicentre evaluation of MTV, TLG and Dmax.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the value of MATERIALS AND
methodsData of 86 patients with pathologically confirmed DLBCL who underwent
resultsAmong 86 patients [(45 men, 41 women, age: 57.8 ± 12.2 years)], the median PFS was 22.5 (14.5, 46) months. Until the last follow-up date, progression or recurrence occurred in 14 patients, while 9 patients died. The ROC curves indicated that the optimal cutoff values for predicting PFS were 99.10%, 99.72%, and 96.47% for ΔMTV%, ΔTLG%, and ΔD
conclusionThe rate of change in metabolic and diffusion parameters on interim PET/CT can predict the prognosis of patients with DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.