Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146417›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice in Spain: survey of patterns of use and oncologists' perceptions.

F Moreno, V Iranzo, I Álvarez, A Antón, J I Chacón, J Gavilá, M Martín, P Sánchez Rovira, P Gratal, M J Fernández González and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F MorenoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
V IranzoMedical Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain. vegairanzo@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-5173
I ÁlvarezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
A AntónMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, Saragossa, Spain.
J I ChacónMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
J GaviláMedical Oncology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
M MartínMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
P Sánchez RoviraMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
P GratalFundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad en La Oncología), Madrid, Spain.
M J Fernández GonzálezFundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad en La Oncología), Madrid, Spain.
R LópezFundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad en La Oncología), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in routine clinical practice in Spain, as well as the perceptions from oncologists.

methodsA survey was developed by nine oncologists, experts in breast cancer, practising in Spain. Survey responses were collected between July 2022 and April 2023.

resultsFifty-one survey responses were obtained. Most oncologists used CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first line. The first-line endocrine therapy most frequently used was an aromatase inhibitor (endocrine-sensitive disease) and fulvestrant (endocrine-resistant disease). CDK4/6 inhibitors were used for primary or secondary resistance, or visceral disease without visceral crisis. A lower-than-standard starting dose was considered (57% of respondents) for specific profiles. Strategies to manage toxicity included switching to another CDK4/6 inhibitor or delaying the next dose. CDK4/6 inhibitors were mostly considered to improve quality of life.

conclusionsUse of CDK4/6 inhibitors in Spain follows current recommendations and aligns with the evidence.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6OncologistsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Protein Kinase InhibitorsAromatase InhibitorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesAromatase InhibitorsCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsBreast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorsClinical practiceSpainToxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.