Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146408›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Tracking effects of age of sign language acquisition and phonology in American Sign Language sentence processing.

Anne Wienholz, Amy M Lieberman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne WienholzInstitute of German Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf, University of Hamburg, Gorch-Fock-Wall 7, 20354, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0762-2983
Amy M LiebermanWheelock College of Education and Human Development, Boston University, 2 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-9216

Funding

Development of Gaze Control for Integration of Language and Visual Information in Deaf ChildrenR01DC015272 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Amy M Lieberman · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015272NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC015272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing sign language involves activation of phonological features of signs. Previous research provides evidence for effects of age of sign language acquisition as well as amount and type of phonological relatedness during processing of single signs, but it is unknown how these factors affect sentence-level sign processing. This paper presents a phonological priming eye tracking study of American Sign Language (ASL) processing, in which we systematically vary the degree and type of phonological relatedness in prime-target sign pairs embedded in ASL sentences. We tested degree of relatedness by using sign pairs sharing either one or two out of three phonological parameters. We tested type of relatedness by using signs that were phonologically related in all possible combinations of the parameters handshape, location, and movement. Participants were exposed to sign language either early (before the age of five years) or late (after the age of five years), allowing us to explore how age of sign language acquisition impacts activation of phonological features of signs. Late signers were more affected by the degree of relatedness than early signers; primes that shared any information with the target led to increased time to identify the target, regardless of the specific parameter(s) that overlapped. There was a high degree of variability for type of relatedness, but sign pairs that shared location were particularly salient. Group differences suggested varying sensitivities to phonological information in early and late signers. Our study emphasizes that phonological relatedness should be carefully controlled when examining sign processing in signers differing in their language backgrounds.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentPhoneticsPsycholinguisticsSign LanguageAdultAge FactorsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAge of acquisitionAmerican Sign LanguageEye trackingPhonological parametersPhonological processing

Identifiers

PMID40146408
PMCPMC12589255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.