Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146401›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025

Test-retest reliability of performance variables during treadmill rollerski skating.

Thomas Losnegard, Paul André Solberg, Magne Lund-Hansen, Martin Skaugen, Joar Hansen, Knut Skovereng, Øyvind Sandbakk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas LosnegardDepartment of Physical Performance, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Ullevål Stadion, Post Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway. thomasl@nih.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-7477
Paul André SolbergNorwegian Olympic Federation, Oslo, Norway.
Magne Lund-HansenDepartment of Physical Performance, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Ullevål Stadion, Post Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway.
Martin SkaugenNorwegian Olympic Federation, Oslo, Norway.
Joar HansenSection of Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Lillehammer, Norway.
Knut SkoverengDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Øyvind SandbakkSchool of Sport Science, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined the test-retest reliability of rollerski testing across a familiarization trial followed by three separate test trials (T1-T3) conducted within a 14-day period.

methodsTen competitive cross-country skiers performed three sub-maximal tests (5%, speed range 10-16 km h

resultsThe speed at MTF demonstrated a mean CV (T1-T3) of 1.5% [1.1, 2.6] and an ICC of 0.96 [0.87, 0.99], but a systematic familiarization bias from T1 to T2 (1.2% [0.1, 2.3]) and T2 to T3 (2.2% [0.1, 4.3]). Peak oxygen uptake exhibited a mean CV of 2.2% [1.6, 3.8] and an ICC of 0.93 [0.78, 0.98], with no systematic changes from T1 to T2 (- 0.2% [- 2.0, 1.6]) and T2 to T3 (1.8% [- 1.1, 4.7]). VO

conclusionThe relatively low CV and high ICC for most measures suggest a high degree of test-retest reliability. However, the systematic mean changes in MTF indicate that familiarization trials are essential to provide valuable information about individual changes. Overall, these reliability measures can be used as a framework by practitioners to discern true changes when testing on a rollerski treadmill.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceExercise TestSkatingSkiingAdultFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCross-country skiingNordic skiingOxygen uptakePerformanceTraining

Identifiers

PMID40146401
PMCPMC12227345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.