ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in prevention of carotid artery stenting-induced intraoperative hypotension.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are limited data on the impact of light sedation (LS) on changes in intraoperative hypotension related to carotid artery stenting (CAS). We aimed to investigate intraoperative hypotension and perioperative complications in CAS under LS with intravenous dexmedetomidine (Dex). A retrospective analysis of 140 consecutive patients who underwent CAS at our centre from September 2018 to March 2021 was performed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of intraoperative hypotension associated with CAS, defined as continuous systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg. The secondary outcomes were perioperative complications, including dysphoria, transient ischaemic attacks (TIA), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), reperfusion syndrome, and 24-h haemodynamic events after CAS. Eighty-nine patients were treated under LS, and 51 patients were treated under local anaesthesia (LA). Intraoperative haemodynamic instability was observed in 13 of 140 (9.3%) patients; hypotension occurred in 2.2% (2/89) of patients in the LS group, which was significantly lower than the rate in the LA group (2.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.027). Dysphoria occurred in 1.1% of the LS cohort and 15.7% of the LA cohort (P < 0.05). TIA was observed in 2.2% of the LS cohort and 15.7% of the LA cohort (P < 0.05), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural stroke, reperfusion syndrome, or 24-h haemodynamic events after CAS between the two groups, and none of the patients exhibited MI. Performing CAS under LS with intravenous Dex was a safe and effective anaesthesia option in terms of inhibiting intraoperative hypotension and could markedly decrease the incidence of dysphoria and TIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40146394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.