ReviewPain and therapy2025
Neurological Deficits Following Regional Anesthesia and Pain Interventions: Reviewing Current Standards of Care.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative clinical outcomes of remimazolam in regional anesthesia: a systematic review of sedation and safety parameters.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Major Cancer Surgery: An Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Unilateral neurodeficit before epidural dose: Differential diagnosis and management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Anesthesia for Labor Analgesia: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in a Resource-Limited Hospital: Prospective Pilot Study of a Hybrid Training Program.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Nerve Injuries After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional anesthesia (RA) has become an integral part of modern anesthesia practice and acute pain management strategies. It provides effective pain relief, reduces opioid consumption, and facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery. However, like any medical intervention, RA is not without risks. RA is associated with potential complications, including neurological deficits which can range from mild and transient to severe and permanent. These neurological deficits may result from non-adherence to established standards of care and deviations from the clinical practice guidelines. An online database search was conducted across multiple websites to identify the relevant articles. The inclusion criteria were articles in English, published between January 2010 and July 2024. The search included various study types, such as case series, observational studies, cross-sectional analyses, cohort studies, longitudinal studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. A total of 38 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this comprehensive review which examines the neurological complications associated with regional anesthesia and pain interventions, with a particular focus on how deviations from the standards of care contribute to adverse neurological outcomes. Furthermore, it highlights preventive strategies aimed at minimizing the risks of these complications and improving patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.