ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025
Global Trends in the Use of Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy for Acute Bipolar-II Depression.Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- Prescription Trends for Bipolar Disorder With and Without Comorbid Substance Use and Anxiety Disorders: A Global Bipolar Cohort Collaborative Study.Bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- Bipolar Disorder in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Overview of Pharmacotherapy Patterns and Clinical Considerations.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with suicidality, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization in bipolar disorder: A cohort study of 1.23 million adults.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Management, Safety, and Outcomes in Bipolar Disorder: An Integrated Narrative Review of Clinical and Translational Evidence.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Review
- Early health economic assessment of eLiActa neuropsychiatrica · 2026Article
- The anxious bipolar phenotype: clinical complexity and treatment response.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- The Anxious Bipolar Phenotype: Clinical Complexity and Treatment Resistance.Research square · 2026Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for the management of bipolar disorder: 2025 update.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Antipsychotic use in bipolar disorder: clinical and genomic correlates- a Mayo clinic bipolar disorder biobank study.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a chronic mental health condition characterized by significant mood swings, including periods of mania or hypomania and depression. Affecting approximately 1-2% of the global population, BD is associated with impaired social functioning, decreased quality of life, and an increased risk of suicide. The disorder presents a substantial burden on healthcare systems and imposes significant economic costs due to lost productivity and the need for extensive treatment and support services. This comprehensive review synthesizes global trends in BD pharmacotherapy over the past 1 to 3 years, focusing on emerging medications, novel treatment protocols, and ongoing debates within the field. Additionally, the review explores differences in prescribing patterns across developed and developing countries, introduces the impact of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine on treatment outcomes. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The primary purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of the global trends in the use of medications for the treatment of BD over the past 1 to 3 years. This review aims to outline the latest studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses relevant to BD pharmacotherapy, highlighting new discoveries and advancements. Furthermore, this review will address ongoing debates and controversies in the field, such as the role of antidepressants in BD treatment and the long-term use of antipsychotics, aiming to bridge knowledge gaps and guide future research directions. RECENT
findingsStudies continue to reinforce the efficacy of lithium in mood stabilization and reduction of suicidal behavior, despite its declining use due to safety concerns. Mood stabilizing anticonvulsants like valproate and carbamazepine continue to be vital alternatives, each with distinct side effect profiles necessitating careful patient monitoring. The approval and increasing use of novel atypical antipsychotics, such as lurasidone (2013) and cariprazine (2015), has expanded treatment options, offering efficacy in different phases of BD with relatively favorable side effect profiles. Antidepressants remain contentious, with evidence suggesting their benefits primarily when used in combination with mood stabilizers. Emerging agents like lumateperone (Dec 2021) and esketamine show promise, while pharmacogenomic research is paving the way for more personalized treatments. The landscape of BD pharmacotherapy is marked by significant advancements and ongoing challenges. Lithium and mood stabilizing anticonvulsants remain foundational treatments, albeit with adherence challenges and side effect concerns. The advent of new atypical antipsychotics and novel agents offers promising therapeutic options, while antidepressants continue to be debated. Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics could emerge as transformative approaches, allowing for more tailored and effective treatments. However, disparities in medication accessibility between developed and developing countries highlight the need for global collaboration to optimize BD management. Continued research and innovation are essential to addressing the complexities of BD and improving patient outcomes worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.