ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic transabdominal adrenalectomy- propensity matched analysis and learning curve.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Da Vinci platform robotic adrenalectomy for adrenal neoplasms: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing perioperative, postoperative, and economic outcomes with laparoscopic adrenalectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Adrenalectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic small bowel resections with intracorporal anastomosis in emergency settings - a retrospective single centre study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Tailored surgery for large adrenal tumors: the minimally invasive to open (hybrid) approach.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: five-year comparative outcomes from a high-volume tertiary endocrine surgery center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic adrenalectomy achieves shorter operative time than laparoscopic approach: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.
methodsIn retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.
resultsIntraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.
conclusionsTaken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.