Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146310›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in non-invasive treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis.

Zhan Su, Sha Liu, Jiulan Wang, Fengying Jin, Youjin Peng, Junjie Wen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhan SuGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China.
Sha LiuGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China.
Jiulan WangGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China.
Fengying JinGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China.
Youjin PengGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China.
Junjie WenGuang'an People's Hospital, Guangan, China. lrica147sci@163.com.

Funding

Guang'an People's Hospital High Quality Development Fund Project 21FZ009Scientific and technological innovation guiding plan project of Guang'an 2021zdxjh13Sichuan government Transfer payment project 2021ZYZFSY01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the advantages of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis.

methodsPatients with uterine leiomyomas (435 cases) and adenomyosis (78 cases) treated in our hospital from March 2020 to October 2023 were selected to receive non-invasive treatment with HIFU. Clinical symptom improvement and fibroid shrinkage were observed, and the incidence of complications and adverse reactions during and after treatment were analyzed.

resultsThe success rate of HIFU treatment in 435 cases of uterine leiomyomas was as high as 94.71%. The success rate of HIFU treatment was 96.15% in 78 cases of adenomyosis. Compared with before treatment, the improvement of clinical symptoms and the reduction of leiomyomas at one month, three months and six months after treatment were relatively better than those at the treatment period (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions in the patients during the treatment.

conclusionThe noninvasive application of HIFU on leiomyomas and adenomyosis effectively improves the clinical symptoms of patients, and the volume of fibroids decreases significantly. At the same time, HIFU is safe and worthy of clinical application.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationLeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdenomyosisHigh intensity focused ultrasoundUterine leiomyomas

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.