ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
"Fish-hook" suturing technique reduces vascular injuries of the pelvic wall during vesico-urethral anastomosis and impacts urinary continence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term transition of urinary status after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to describe our novel suturing technique, the "Fish-hook", during urethra-vesico anastomosis in a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy procedure. The medical information was extracted from the clinical records of 348 patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at Chiba Tokushukai Hospital between April 2017 and June 2023. The impact of the "Fish-hook" technique on surgical outcomes was examined by statistical analysis. The "Fish-hook" technique was not used in 123 patients (Group 1) and was used in 225 patients (Group 2). The suturing time for urethra-vesico anastomosis was significantly shorter in Group 2. The number of cases with the needle-driver having no contact with the pelvic wall during anastomosis was 51 vs. 212 cases (Group 1 vs. Group 2; P < 0.01). The hemostasis associated with the injury to the pelvic wall was observed in 14 and 6 cases of Group 1 and 2, respectively. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard models show that urinary continence recovery was shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1 (time to pad 1 per day/pad free is 110/365 days vs. 87/181 days; P = 0.01/< 0.01, respectively) The "Fish-hook" suturing technique showed an excellent outcome regarding urinary continence. This suturing method allows the surgeons to perform sutures in small working spaces without injuring the pelvic wall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.