Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146277›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Bone mineral density in childhood cancer survivors during and after oncological treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anna Maria Markarian, Dennis R Taaffe, Francesco Bettariga, Hao Luo, Daniel A Galvão, Jodie Cochrane Wilkie, Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre, Robert U Newton

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Maria MarkarianExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Dennis R TaaffeExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Francesco BettarigaExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Hao LuoExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Daniel A GalvãoExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Jodie Cochrane WilkieExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyreExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Robert U NewtonExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia. r.newton@ecu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-6129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis poses a significant concern for childhood cancer survivors (CCS). While recommendations for surveillance and management of bone mineral density (BMD) exist, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been undertaken to quantify BMD Z-scores in childhood cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment and survivors who have completed treatments. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review with a 3-level mixed-effects meta-analysis to examine the course of BMD Z-scores in childhood cancer patients and survivors and identified possible moderators using meta-regression models. A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2023. We included studies that involved children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer before the age of 18 who were undergoing cancer treatment or had completed treatments and reported lumbar spine, hip/femoral neck, or total body BMD Z-scores derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Forty-nine studies (4547 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. BMD Z-scores across different sites decreased with respect to baseline in children undergoing cancer treatment (mean difference: - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.11; p = .01) and remained low following treatment in child and adolescent CCS (lumbar spine: - 0.85 SD, 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.54; p < .001; hip/femoral neck: - 1.03 SD, 95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.68; p < .001), and adult CCS (lumbar spine: - 0.46 SD, 95% CI - 0.67 to - 0.26; p < .001; hip/femoral neck: - 0.36 SD, 95% CI - 0.57 to - 0.16; p < .001). Hip/femoral neck BMD Z-scores were moderated by age at assessment (p = .006), time from diagnosis (p = .004), sex (p = .037), and height (p = .026). Lumbar spine BMD Z-scores were moderated by age at assessment (p = .018), and sex (p = .015). In conclusion, childhood cancer patients and survivors experience reductions in BMD. Future research should evaluate the implications of regular physical activity, targeted exercise medicine, and nutrition therapy as first-line countermeasures to mitigate the declines in bone health.

Indexed as

Bone DensityCancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentChildFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeBone mineral densityChildhood cancerDual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Identifiers

PMID40146277
PMCPMC12089199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.