Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Artificial intelligence-based multimodal prediction for nuclear grading status and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.

Qingyuan Zheng, Haonan Mei, Xiaodong Weng, Rui Yang, Panpan Jiao, Xinmiao Ni, Xiangxiang Yang, Jiejun Wu, Junjie Fan, Jingping Yuan and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qingyuan ZhengDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-3857
Haonan MeiDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaodong WengDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Rui YangDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Panpan JiaoDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xinmiao NiDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiangxiang YangDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiejun WuDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Junjie FanUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jingping YuanDepartment of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiuheng LiuDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhiyuan ChenDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4241-7763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) nuclear grade is crucial for the management and treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aimed to explore the value of using integrated multimodal information for ISUP grading and prognostic stratification in ccRCC patients, to guide postoperative adjuvant therapy.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed a total of 729 patients from three cohorts, utilizing whole slide i-mages and computed tomography (CT) images. Artificial intelligence algorithms were used to extract morphological and textural features from whole slide images and CT images separately, creating single-modality predictive models for ISUP grading. By combining the CT and pathology single-modality predictive features, a multimodal predictive signature (MPS) was developed. The prognostic performance of the MPS model was further validated in two independent cohorts.

resultsThe single-modality predictive models for CT and pathology performed well in predicting ISUP grade for ccRCC. The MPS model achieved higher area under the curve values of 0.95, 0.93, and 0.95 across three independent patient cohorts. Additionally, the MPS model was able to distinguish patients with poorer overall survival. In the external validation cohort, uni- and multivariate analyses showed hazard ratios of 2.542 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.363-4.741, P < 0.0001) and 1.723 (95% CI: 0.888-3.357, P = 0.003), respectively. The C-index values for the two cohorts were 0.75 and 0.71. Furthermore, the MPS outperformed single-modality models, providing a complementary tool for current risk stratification in ccRCC adjuvant therapy.

conclusionOur novel MPS model demonstrated high accuracy in ISUP grading for ccRCC patients. With further validation across multiple centers, the MPS model could be used for precise detection of nuclear grading in ccRCC, serving as an effective tool for assisting clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computeddeep learningmultimodalpathologyradiologyrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40146270
PMCPMC12165539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.