ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation as first-line curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations a prospective multicenter.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Tumor Treating Fields: Multimodal Antitumor Action and the Clinical Potential of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of an Irreversible Electroporation System with Real-Time Electrical and Thermal Monitoring for Liver Tumors: A Bicentric Retrospective Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Incidence and risk factors of complications following microsecond and nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 10-year multicenter cohort study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Nanosecond Electric Pulses as a Novel In Situ Vaccination Strategy for Cancer Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges and Prospects.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Synergistic Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields and Cold Atmospheric Plasma via Amplifying ROS and Apoptotic Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Global Advances in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research and Therapy in 2025.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Increases the Susceptibility of Human A549 Cells to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Precision Intracellular Oncotherapy: Recent Advances and Emerging Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pulsed electric fields: a sharp sword in the battle against cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical studies have shown that nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation (nsPEF) is a novel nonthermal ablation modality that can eradicate tumors near critical structures. We conducted the prospective multicenter trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of nsPEF for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted at five hospitals in China. Patients with HCC fulfilling the Milan criteria and located immediately adjacent to (<0.5 cm) the portal vein, hepatic vein, diaphragm, gastrointestinal tract, liver capsule, or gallbladder were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the complete ablation rate at 1 month, and adverse events. The secondary endpoints included local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival.
resultsFrom March 2020 to June 2022, 192 patients were enrolled (148 males [77.1%]; median age 58.5 years [interquartile range, 51.0-66.0 years]). The median follow-up duration was 33.5 months. The technical success rate was 99.5%. Complete ablation was achieved in 91.7% of the 217 tumors. Complete ablation rates at 1 month were significantly higher in tumors <2 cm vs. ≥2 cm (90.1% vs. 71.7%, P = 0.002). The estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative incidences of LTP were 9.8%, 13.8%, and 15.7%, respectively. The maximum tumor diameter (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.62, P = 0.014) and age (HR = 0.42, P = 0.026) were independent predictive factors for LTP. The RFS rates at 1-, 2- and 3-year were 72.2%, 51.7%, and 43.5%, respectively. No periprocedural thermal damage was observed. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in nine (5.6%) patients.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this was the first prospective trial demonstrating that nsPEF was effective and relatively safe for HCC in high-risk locations, and may serve as an alternative therapeutic option for HCC suboptimal for thermal ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.