Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146262›Full record

Trial reportCalcified tissue international2025

Impact of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Score Following Denosumab Discontinuation in Older Adults in Long-Term Care.

Nami Safai Haeri, Subashan Perera, Susan L Greenspan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nami Safai HaeriDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1110, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. safaihaerin@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-5980
Subashan PereraDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1110, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Susan L GreenspanDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1110, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Preserving Geriatric Muscle with an Osteoporosis MedicationR01AG081359 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Christine E Kistler · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081359NIH HHS R01 AG081359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discontinuation of denosumab can result in rebound bone loss and increased vertebral fracture risk. In residents of long-term care communities (LTCCs) with osteoporosis, there is limited data on managing the risks after discontinuation. We investigated the impact of a single dose of zoledronic acid on bone density and microarchitecture following two years of denosumab treatment. In an open-label, one-year extension study following a two-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 39 older adults aged 65 years and above, who were residents of LTCCs and participants in the PROUD (PReventing Osteoporosis Using Denosumab) trial, received a single 5 mg dose of zoledronic acid after completing four doses of denosumab 60 mg during the PROUD trial. We aim to evaluate the effects of a single 5 mg dose of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and one-third radius, as well as on the spine trabecular bone score (TBS), over a one-year period. Additionally, we surveyed patients for fractures. Our study included 27 women and 12 men, with a mean age of 81.5 years. Twelve months after the administration of zoledronic acid, the mean percent changes from the end of the denosumab trial showed no significant decline in any of the BMD sites in both women and men. In women, the mean percent changes were as follows: spine 0.97 (95% CI: -0.7 to 2.7, p = 0.242) and total hip -0.10 (95% CI: -2.3 to 2.1, p = 0.927). In men, the changes were -0.32 (95% CI: -3.7 to 3.1, p = 0.832) for the spine and 1.79 (95% CI: -0.7 to 4.3, p = 0.139) for the total hip. These findings indicate no evidence of rebound bone loss. In women, TBS significantly increased by 3.9% (95% CI: 0.8 to 5.8, p = 0.007), suggesting improved bone microarchitecture. In men, there was a trend toward improvement in TBS, with an increase of 3.3% (95% CI: -4.0 to 13.0, p = 0.054). There were no reported fragility fractures among participants during the post-denosumab period. In residents of LTCCs with osteoporosis receiving a single 5 mg dose of zoledronic acid following two years of denosumab, we found no evidence of a loss in BMD or TBS. Further, participants experienced enhanced bone microarchitecture.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCancellous BoneDenosumabOsteoporosisZoledronic AcidAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabZoledronic AcidBone microarchitectureBone mineral densityDenosumab discontinuationLong-term careOsteoporosisZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID40146262
PMCPMC12280700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.