Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2025
Effectiveness of a group intervention to improve mental health in siblings of children with chronic disorders: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04056884 (A Randomized Controlled Group Intervention Trial for Siblings and Parents of Children With Chronic Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Group Intervention Trial for Siblings and Parents of Children With Chronic Illness (SIBS-RCT)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychopathology and Other Mental Health Challenges in Siblings of Patients with Child- or Adolescent-Onset Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review with a Sex/Gender Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Support Needs and Available Resources for School-Aged Siblings of Children With Disabilities: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- Sibling Relationship Profiles of Autistic Youths in a Social-Ecological Context.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Communication quality between parents and siblings of children with chronic disorders.PEC innovation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the effectiveness of SIBS, a preventive intervention for siblings and parents of children with chronic disorders (CDs).
methodsThis two-arm, unmasked cluster randomized controlled trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04056884), included 288 siblings (M age = 10.4 years, SD = 1.9) and parents of children with CDs (mainly neurodevelopmental disorders) randomly assigned to intervention (k = 34, n = 137) or waitlist control (k = 35, n = 151) groups. Eligible siblings were aged 8-16 years and had a sibling diagnosed with a CD. SIBS is manual-based and was delivered as five sessions over 2 weeks in primary care and hospital settings across Norway. Three sessions are separate for siblings and parents, and two are integrated sibling-parent dialogues. The primary outcome was sibling mental health, rated by siblings, parents, and teachers. The secondary outcome was parent-child communication, rated by siblings and parents. Analyses included intention-to-treat (ITT) and complier average causal effects (CACE).
resultsAlthough not statistically significant, at 3-month follow-up, the intervention group showed fewer mental health problems (ITT: sibling-rated d = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.49, 0.17]; parent-rated d = -0.10, 95% CI [-0.48, 0.12]; teacher-rated d = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.29]) and higher-quality parent-child communication (ITT: sibling-rated d = 0.21, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.52]; parent-rated d = 0.24, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.55]) compared to waitlist.
conclusionsThe SIBS intervention demonstrated small, consistent positive effects on sibling mental health and parent-child communication. This suggests SIBS is a promising preventive program for siblings of children with CDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.