ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
How, why, and under what circumstances can supportive supervision programs improve malaria case management? A realist program theory.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facility readiness and determinants of malaria test-before-treat implementation in public health facilities in Kaduna and Kano States, Nigeria.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Understanding the drivers of effective supportive supervision: a realist evaluation of community health worker programs in Madhya Pradesh, India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Supportive supervision (SS) programs aim to enhance the quality of care by strengthening the performance of health providers. Commonly part of broader quality improvement efforts, SS programs are increasingly used in low-and middle-income countries to improve malaria case management. Despite substantial investments and some positive outcomes, little is known about what drives their effectiveness. A realist evaluation was conducted in Tanzania and Benin to explain how, why, and under what circumstances SS programs can improve the facility-based management of uncomplicated malaria in children <5 years. A program theory was developed through a team-based analysis of empirical data collected in both countries at two time points. Data included 218 in-depth and 12 structured interviews with stakeholders, 154 audits of febrile case management decisions, and 4 health facility audits. Stakeholder perspectives identified three acceptability mechanisms driving SS program outcomes in the studied contexts: the affective attitude, self-efficacy, and burden of the program as perceived by key actors. The pathway through which these mechanisms were perceived to shape malaria case management (diagnosis and treatment) practices was defined by the (i) extent to which the program was integrated into the public health system; (ii) frequency with which SS visits were conducted by appropriate supervisors; (iii) degree to which supervisors coached, rather than policed, supervisees; and (iv) level of collaboration achieved between supervisees and supervisors. The program actors' perception of the program's effectiveness was also found to be crucial to its sustainability. This study explains the dynamics driving SS program outcomes and underscores the role played by the cognitive and emotional responses of program actors. These insights are likely to be transferable to other settings with similar contexts and can help inform the design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of new and ongoing SS programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.