Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146037›Full record

Trial reportCritical care explorations2025

Evaluation of Plasma Biomarkers to Understand the Biology and Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the REST Trial.

Andrew J Boyle, Kiran Reddy, John Conlon, Georg Auzinger, Jonathan Bannard-Smith, Nicholas A Barrett, Luigi Camporota, Michael A Gillies, Colette Jackson, Clíona McDowell and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02654327 (pRotective vEntilation With Veno-venouS Lung assisT in Respiratory Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02654327 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

pRotective vEntilation With Veno-venouS Lung assisT in Respiratory Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorBelfast Health and Social Care TrustRan2016 to 2022Enrolled1,120ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaArmsVV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Andrew J BoyleWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-805
Kiran ReddyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
John ConlonWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Georg AuzingerDepartment of Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Bannard-SmithDepartment of Adult Critical Care, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nicholas A BarrettDepartment of Critical Care, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Luigi CamporotaDepartment of Critical Care, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Michael A GilliesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Colette JacksonNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Clíona McDowellNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Brijesh PatelDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Gavin D PerkinsHeartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Tamás SzakmányCritical Care Directorate, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom.
William TunnicliffeUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Ingeborg D WeltersDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
James J McNameeRegional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Cecilia M O'KaneWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Research and Development Office EAT/5105/14Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), the use of lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal (vv-ECCO2R) does not improve clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate for differences in indices of systemic inflammation and ventilator-induced lung injury between patients treated with lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by vv-ECCO2R and standard care. Secondary objectives included an evaluation for heterogeneity of treatment effect.

designSubstudy of a randomized clinical trial.

settingNine U.K. ICUs. PATIENTS: Moderate-to-severe AHRF (Pao2: Fio2 < 150mmHg [20ka]).

interventionPlasma samples obtained at baseline and day 3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe primary outcome was day 3 C-reactive protein (CRP). Clinical outcomes included 90-day mortality and ventilator-free days (VFD) until day 28. Exploratory analyses included an evaluation of plasma indices of lung injury, inflammation, and heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE). Seventy-nine patients were enrolled, and 69 patients had paired plasma samples taken at baseline and day 3. There was no difference in day 3 plasma CRP (intervention 138.6 [70.4, 189.4] vs. standard care 113.0 [62.7, 233.8] mg/L; p = 0.72). Between baseline and day 3, there was a greater increase in plasma interleukin-18 in patients that received intervention compared with those that received standard care (Δ 337.7 [-128.9, 738.9] vs. 6.4 [-457.2, 6.4] pg/mL p = 0.05). In patients with high interleukin-18, allocation to intervention was associated with increased VFDs (p = 0.03). Similarly in patients with a hyperinflammatory phenotype, the intervention was independently associated with increased VFDs (p < 0.01) and decreased 90-day mortality (p = 0.01).

conclusionsIn patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF, lower tidal volume ventilation, facilitated by vv-ECCO2R, was not associated with a difference in day 3 plasma CRP, but was associated with an increase in plasma interleukin-18 between baseline and day 3. Baseline plasma interleukin-18 and inflammatory phenotypes may identify subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF that benefit from lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by vv-ECCO2R.

trial registrationNCT02654327.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideHypoxiaRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyAgedBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedTidal VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryBiomarkersCarbon DioxideC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID40146037
PMCPMC11952827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.