ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Modeling MRD Changes in Myeloma to Understand Treatment Effects, Predict Outcomes, and Investigate Curative Potential.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe designed mathematical models to describe and quantify the mechanisms and dynamics of minimal residual disease (MRD) in order to better understand these MRD dynamics; inform future treatment design, including when to stop or change treatment; and extrapolate from current progression-free survival (PFS) times to predict future PFS curves. EXPERIMENTAL
designThis study aims to model individual sequential MRD data from phase III clinical trials (MAIA, CASTOR, and POLLUX) using previously developed mathematical models, which will be modified as needed to accurately reflect the actual MRD data. These models will then be used to project PFS curves into the future.
resultsPatients with low MRD values either showed rapid disease regrowth, or the MRD values remained low for a prolonged period. Treatment seemed to be most effective in terms of cell kill within the first 6 to 12 months. Regrowth rates were correlated with estimated initial residual disease, particularly in MRD-negative patients. Three-year model extrapolations of PFS were closely comparable with clinical trial data.
conclusionsThis model could provide early prediction of PFS outcomes, which otherwise takes lengthy periods of time to observe in clinical trials. Patients showing rapid rebound from low MRD values may benefit from adding another treatment before reaching progressive disease. The MRD analyses and results presented, such as the results about efficacy occurring early in the first 6 to 12 months, may help guide the development and selection of optimal regimens. Longer follow-up periods and application to other trials and datasets are required to substantiate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.