Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Modeling Hourly Productivity of Advanced Practice Clinicians in the Emergency Department.
Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advance practice clinicians (APC) play significant roles in academic and community emergency departments (ED). In attendings and residents, prior research demonstrated that productivity is dynamic and changes throughout a shift in a predictable way. However, this has not been studied in APCs. The primary outcome of this study was to model productivity for APCs in community EDs to determine whether it changes during a shift similar to the way it does for attendings and residents. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational analysis of 10-hour APC shifts at two suburban hospitals, worked by 14 total individuals. We examined the number of patients seen per hour of the shift by experienced APCs who see all acuity and staff all patients with an attending. We used a generalized estimating equation to construct the model of hour-by-hour productivity change. Results: We analyzed 862 shifts over one year across two sites, with three shift start times. Site 1 10 am-8 pm saw an average of 13.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.02-13.63) patients per shift; Site 2 8 am-6 pm saw an average of 12.64 (95% CI 12.32-13.06) patients per shift; Site 2 4 pm-2 am saw an average of 12.53 (95% CI 12.04-12.82) patients per shift. Across all sites and shifts, hour 1 saw the highest number of patients. Each subsequent hour was associated with a small, statistically significant decrease over the previous hours. This was most pronounced in the shift's last two hours. Conclusion: The productivity of APCs demonstrates a similar pattern of hourly declines observed in both resident and attending physicians. This corroborates prior findings that patients per hour is a dynamic variable, decreasing throughout a shift. This provides further external validity to prior research to include both APCs and community EDs. These departments must take this phenomenon into account, as it has scheduling and operational consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.