ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Two-year Results of an Emergency Department Night Shift Buy-out Program.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Perceived Social and Emotional Support from Co-Workers and Supervisors and Occupational Stress in Emergency Physicians: A Pre-Pandemic National Cross-Sectional Study from Slovenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Attrition Among Emergency Physicians.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency physicians have the highest rates of burnout among our physician peers, with prior literature suggesting clinician schedules can play a significant role in burnout. We assessed our transition from a tenure- and age-based paradigm to an egalitarian, night shift buy-out program that allows schedule flexibility for physicians at all stages of their careers. Methods: The night shift buy-out program was implemented in the emergency department (ED) of an academic, quaternary-care center that treats approximately 100,000 adult patients annually with 56 faculty emergency physicians. We sought to create a cost-neutral program, carefully balancing incentives between nocturnists and those wanting to reduce allotted night shifts. Ultimately, the program was designed to allow all faculty to buy out of any number of nights for $500 per night shift, with the funds generated used to increase nocturnist salaries. We analyzed two years of the program (July 2022-June 2024) to assess trends in night shift buy-outs, the primary outcome. We also conducted an all-faculty survey after the program's first year to gauge sentiments about the program. Results: Over two years, 22 faculty (42%) fully bought out of nights; an additional 10 (15%) bought out of some nights. By year two, the program could grant all faculty their preferred night-shift allotment. Faculty who bought out fully had worked longer in EM on average, worked fewer clinical hours per year, were more likely to be associate/full professors, and were less likely to be women. Nocturnists had the highest mean clinical hours of the four groups, had the lowest average tenure, and were least likely to be associate/full professors. A total of 86% of faculty responded to the survey, to which more than 80% of those buying out reported that reducing the night-shift burden was either "very important" or "critical for continuing in this job." Conclusion: Our academic ED transitioned from a tenure- and age-based, overnight shift paradigm to an egalitarian buy-out program that allows physicians flexibility at all career stages. This approach could improve career satisfaction and reduce burnout among emergency physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.