SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2025
Endoscopic Techniques for Colorectal Neoplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review: Ultrasound Goes Echo-Decarbonising Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care Through Intestinal Ultrasound.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Beyond the Intestinal Mucosa in Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Consequences of Chronic Inflammation and Endoscopic Approaches to Diagnosis and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy for intestinal dysplasia and neoplasia detection and management in Crohn's disease: when and how?Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) has been the preferred method for colonoscopy surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with advances in endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) techniques have emerged. This network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of different endoscopy techniques for IBD patient surveillance.
methodsSixteen randomized controlled trials involving 2514 patients were included in the analysis, comparing endoscopy techniques in IBD patient surveillance: DCE, high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), standard-definition WLE, i-scan, narrow band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and autofluorescence imaging (AFI). We assessed the per patient neoplasia detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and withdrawal time between different endoscopy techniques. Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the neoplasia detection rate according to endoscopy techniques using various biopsy protocols.
resultsComparing neoplasia detection rates revealed that only DCE (OR: 2.56 [1.17-5.59]) significantly increased the neoplasia detection rate compared with standard-definition WLE. The subsequent rankings were high-definition WLE, NBI, FICE, i-scan, and AFI. Moreover, the PPVs of DCE, VCE, and high-definition WLE showed no significant difference compared with that of standard-definition WLE. However, DCE required a significantly longer withdrawal time. Subgroup analysis showed that DCE with random biopsy or target biopsy and high-definition WLE with target biopsy had superior neoplasia detection rates than standard-definition WLE with random biopsy.
conclusionDCE significantly outperforms standard-definition WLE in neoplasia detection rates, with random biopsy providing additional benefits. Although DCE does not lower PPV, it requires more withdrawal time. If DCE-based surveillance is not feasible, high-definition WLE with targeted biopsy should be considered as other VCE techniques offer no significant advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.