ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025
Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to validate and provide detailed norms on suicide images commonly used in experimental suicide research, and to examine whether appraisals of suicide images varied based on image features and prior suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs).
methodYoung adults (N = 264) rated the extent to which images depicted someone "trying to kill themselves on purpose or who did kill themselves on purpose" (i.e., suicide ratings). Suicide ratings were examined descriptively and with bivariate and multivariable statistics.
resultsSuicide images demonstrated construct validity at image and aggregate levels. Further, suicide images looked more like suicide than pleasant, neutral, and interpersonal violence images, bs ≥ 5.653, ts ≥ 52.505, ps < 0.001. Among suicide images, suicide ratings were higher for images without compared to with gore, b = 0.269, t = 7.714, p < 0.001, and for images depicting high lethality methods (e.g., hanging, firearm) compared to the grand mean of all methods, bs ≥ 0.235, ts ≥ 3.316, ps < 0.001. Suicide ratings of suicide images were not associated with prior STBs.
conclusionUsing valid suicide images, like those tested in the current study, could improve behavioral methods designed to study processes related to STBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.