Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145687›Full record

ReviewActa odontologica Scandinavica2025

Application of machine learning in dentistry: insights, prospects and challenges.

Lin Wang, Yanyan Xu, Weiqian Wang, Yuanyuan Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lin WangHangzhou Stomatology Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yanyan XuHealth Service Center in Xiaoying Street Community, Hangzhou, China.
Weiqian WangHangzhou Stomatology Hospital, Hangzhou, China. hzwwq@163.com.
Yuanyuan LuCollege of Environmental and Resources Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. yuanyuan.lu@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) is transforming dentistry by setting new standards for precision and efficiency in clinical practice, while driving improvements in care delivery and quality.

objectivesThis review: (1) states the necessity to develop ML in dentistry for the purpose of breaking the limitations of traditional dental technologies; (2) discusses the principles of ML-based models utilised in dental clinical practice and care; (3) outlines the application respects of ML in dentistry; and (4) highlights the prospects and challenges to be addressed. DATA AND SOURCES: In this narrative review, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore databases.  Conclusions: Machine Learning has demonstrated significant potential in dentistry with its intelligently assistive function, promoting diagnostic efficiency, personalised treatment plans and related streamline workflows. However, challenges related to data privacy, security, interpretability, and ethical considerations were highly urgent to be addressed in the next review, with the objective of creating a backdrop for future research in this rapidly expanding arena.  Clinical significance: Development of ML brought transformative impact in the fields of dentistry, from diagnostic, personalised treatment plan to dental care workflows. Particularly, integrating ML-based models with diagnostic tools will significantly enhance the diagnostic efficiency and precision in dental surgeries and treatments.

Indexed as

DentistryMachine LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID40145687
PMCPMC11971948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.