Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145658›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Biology wet lab e-learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of student learning and experiences.

Cristina Maglio, Manuela Williams, Alessandro Camponeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Biology wet lab e-learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of student learning and experiences.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina MaglioDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-5767
Manuela WilliamsDepartment of Humanities, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Alessandro CamponeschiDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-2438

Funding

Adlerbertska Research FoundationRune och Ulla Amlövs Stiftelse för Neurologisk och Reumatologisk ForskningStiftelsen Assar Gabrielssons Fond FB21-104Stiftelsen Konung Gustaf V:s 80-årsfond FAI-2019-0618Stiftelsen Konung Gustaf V:s 80-årsfond FAI-2020-0706Stiftelsen Konung Gustaf V:s 80-årsfond SGI-2018-0510Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning S20-0109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic began as a health crisis and quickly turned into an economic, social, and political crisis. It revealed the vulnerability of education systems to external changes and risks and challenged institutions and educators to transform and adapt at short notice. Following the COVID-19 outbreak, one of the natural consequences was the unprecedented rise in online education. The transition from the in-person teaching format to e-learning exposed teachers and students to significant challenges. In the biomedical field, e-learning forced teachers to rethink hands-on wet lab teaching into a hands-off virtual one; this digital transformation has continued in the post-pandemic period and has resulted in the emergence of hybrid models trying to harmonize the benefits of e-learning with those of in-person teaching. In this narrative review, we analyzed articles published between 2020 and 2024 focusing on the teaching of molecular and cellular biology laboratory through online or blended learning formats. We focused on the impact that pedagogical innovation in laboratory e-learning has had on student perceptions, experience, and outcomes. We have extracted five major themes that should be considered by educators involved in course design to enhance the benefits of exposing students to learning in a virtual lab: (1) the varying effectiveness of laboratory e-learning, (2) the potential for online labs to foster self-efficacy and confidence, (3) the reduced opportunities for social interaction in virtual settings, (4) students' perspectives on virtual, blended, and in-person lab work, and (5) the importance of addressing student inequities in digital access.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistancePandemicsStudentsHumansLearningSARS-CoV-2biological sciencee‐learninglearningstudent experiencestudent perceptionsteachingwet lab

Identifiers

PMID40145658
PMCPMC12290244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.