Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145589›Full record

ArticleActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2025

[Combined Proximal Radius Reconstruction Following Resection for Oncological Indication].

Mário Malina, Matej Majerčík, Yousef Naser

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mário MalinaI. ortopedicko-traumatologicka klinika Lekarskej fakulty Univerzity Komenskeho a Univerzitnej nemocnice Bratislava.
Matej MajerčíkI. ortopedicko-traumatologicka klinika Lekarskej fakulty Univerzity Komenskeho a Univerzitnej nemocnice Bratislava.
Yousef NaserKlinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohyboveho ustrojenstva Univerzitnej nemocnice L. Pasteura Kosice.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early surgical treatment of giant cell tumour of the bone has very good functional outcomes with a relatively low risk of local recurrence and metastatic spread.In case of a pathologic fracture, extraosseous extension, and tumor location in an anatomically difficult area, surgical treatment may represent a big challenge with an uncertain functional outcome.Our case report presents a 35-year-old patient with a delayed diagnosis of giant cell tumor of the proximal radius of the dominant limb, with pulmonary metastases. Following neoadjuvant Denosumab therapy, with a major treatment effect on both the primary tumor and pulmonary metastases, we performed a wide resection and combined biological reconstruction with fibular autograft, radial head endoprosthesis, and comprehensive elbow ligament reconstruction.At 24 months after surgery, the patient is self-sufficient, capable of more physically demanding work, with a satisfactory functional outcome of reconstruction (MSTS 66.6%, TESS 69%), with no signs of local recurrence and regression of pulmonary metastases at 18 months after the last administration of Denosumab.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsGiant Cell Tumor of BoneLung NeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresRadiusAdultBone Density Conservation AgentsBone TransplantationDenosumabFibulaHumansTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabbiological reconstruction.Denosumabgiant cell tumor of the boneproximal radiuswide resection

Identifiers

PMID40145589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.