ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Cancer Cell Line Classification Using Raman Spectroscopy of Cancer-Derived Exosomes and Machine Learning.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and extracellular vesicles in oncology: towards tumor diagnosis, prediction, and therapy.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Lipid Messengers: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of Exosomal Lipids in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Raman Spectral Classification with Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A two-signal aptasensor for sensitive exosome detection via rolling circle amplification and G-quadruplex structure.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- LYVAC/PDZD8 is a lysosomal vacuolator.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for label-free cancer liquid biopsy: from fundamentals to clinical analysis of biofluid.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsies are an emerging, noninvasive tool for cancer diagnostics, utilizing biological fluids for molecular profiling. Nevertheless, the current methods often lack the sensitivity and specificity necessary for early detection and real-time monitoring. This work explores an advanced approach to improving liquid biopsy techniques through machine learning analysis of the Raman spectra measured to classify distinct exosome solutions by their cancer origin. This was accomplished by conducting principal component analysis (PCA) of the Raman spectra of exosomes from three cancer cell lines (COLO205, A375, and LNCaP) to extract chemically significant features. This reduced set of features was then utilized to train a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier to predict the source of the exosomes. Furthermore, we investigated differences in the lipid composition in these exosomes by their spectra. This spectral similarity analysis revealed differences in lipid profiles between the different cancer cell lines as well as identified the predominant lipids across all exosomes. Our PCA-LDA framework achieved 93.3% overall accuracy and F1 scores of 98.2%, 91.1%, and 91.0% for COLO205, A375, and LNCaP, respectively. Our results from spectral similarity analysis were also shown to support previous findings of lipid dynamics due to cancer pathology and pertaining to exosome function and structure. These findings underscore the benefits of enhancing Raman spectroscopy analysis with machine learning, laying the groundwork for the development of early noninvasive cancer diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies. This work potentially establishes the foundation for refining the classification model and optimizing exosome extraction and detection from clinical samples for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.