ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2025
Preclinical Testing of 3D Printed, Cell Loaded Hydrogel Based Corneal Substitutes on Rabbit Model.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Corneal Epithelial Tissue Engineering Strategy Based on Cell Viability Optimization: A Review and Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preclinical Testing of 3D Printed, Cell Loaded Hydrogel Based Corneal Substitutes on Rabbit Model.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Transparent GelMA biomaterials: Advanced solutions for ocular tissue engineering and regenerative ophthalmology.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many people lose their vision due to corneal stroma injuries of the eye and the golden solution is transplantation of allografts from donors. Unfortunately, the limited availability of donor tissue, risk of disease transmission, and immune rejection are serious handicaps. However, implants made of biomaterials can be used as substitutes. In this study, cell-loaded and cell-free, methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) implants are 3D printed and tested under in vitro conditions. The samples are physically characterized for their printability, equilibrium water content, compressive mechanical strength, and transparency; they retained 60%-80% of light transmission in the visible region as in the native corneas. In brief, they are suitable for further testing. Then cell loaded samples are tested in vivo on New Zealand white rabbits for 90 days. In the in vivo tests, these cell loaded, disk shaped implants are almost completely degraded and allowed reorganization of the tissue forming at the implantation site. Also, the immune response initially observed decreased in time and by the end of 90 days the tissue regained its normal, healthy architecture with multilayered, non-keratinized epithelium. It can be concluded that the implants developed in this study are promising for clinical use in corneal stroma recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.