ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Perceived feasibility of a multicomponent prenatal intervention on childhood vaccinations: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of prenatal care providers, April-June 2022.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are inadequate proactive interventions that take advantage of medical contacts during pregnancy to build confidence in vaccines recommended for children after birth. In addition, prenatal providers' perceptions on implementing such proactive childhood vaccination-focused interventions are not well understood.
methodsA multicomponent prenatal intervention on childhood vaccines was designed for expectant parents to include a prenatal provider recommendation encouraging age-appropriate vaccines for children after birth, an educational website on vaccine recommendations and resources, and a phone consultation with a vaccine navigator during pregnancy. Members of national prenatal provider organizations in the USA were recruited from April to June 2022 for an online cross-sectional survey to assess their demographic and practice characteristics, perceived role as vaccine advocates, training needs, perceived intervention feasibility, and perceived implementation factors.
resultsAfter data validation, 495 of 1677 responses were included for analysis. Providers expressed agreement (65.1%) with the importance of discussing vaccinations with others, but fewer (46.7%) agreed that they changed people's views on vaccination. Over half of providers agreed or completely agreed that the proposed intervention was feasible, as measured through the four-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (% agreement range reported across items for educational website: 71.4%-75.2%; provider recommendation: 54.0%-59.7%; and vaccine navigator: 53.9%-56.7%). Availability of adequate staff resources (48.0%), time constraints (47.8%), and adequate training on childhood vaccines (45.4%) were the top three perceived implementation challenges. Perceived facilitators included availability of patient education resources on childhood vaccines (57.7%).
conclusionThe proposed intervention to build confidence in childhood vaccines was perceived by providers to be feasible in prenatal settings. Supportive strategies that reduce time and staff burden and increase provider competency to discuss childhood vaccines will be necessary to overcome perceived implementation challenges. Intervention feasibility and implementation factors should be reassessed upon actual implementation of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.