ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Cut-points and gray zones: The challenges of integrating Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers into clinical practice.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer Disease in Primary Care: The Gap Between Biology and Clinical Utility.Neurology · 2026Review
- Remnant cholesterol inflammation index (RCII) as a potential biomarker for ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from dual-cohort analysis and serum lipidomics.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of an automated plasma p-tau217 chemiluminescent assay for detecting Aβ pathology in a Chinese memory clinic cohort.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- What Does a Positive Alzheimer Disease Blood-Based Biomarker Result Mean in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment?Neurology · 2026Review
- Factors influencing implementation of an Alzheimer's disease blood test among UK old age psychiatrists: mixed-methods study using the theoretical domains framework.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: a joint position paper from the Italian Societies of Neurology (SIN) and of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology - Laboratory Medicine(SIBioC) and from the Autonomous Association affiliated with SIN for dementia (SINdem).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Anemia, iron deficiency, and blood biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: clinical interpretation and dementia risk stratification.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Translating blood-based biomarkers into Alzheimer's disease clinical practice: screening, diagnosis, and longitudinal monitoring.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Predicting cognitive decline with amyloid-PET, plasma p-tau217, Aβ42/40, and p-tau217/Aβ42 in a community-based cohort - relevance for clinical trial enrollment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- P-tau217 as a Biomarker in Alzheimer's Disease: Applications in Latin American Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cut-points and gray zones: The challenges of integrating Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers into clinical practice.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), such as plasma phosphorylated (p)-tau217, offer a more accessible means of testing for the presence of AD pathology compared to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET) methods. They can support diagnostic assessment and determine patient eligibility for treatment with amyloid beta-lowering drugs in community settings where access to CSF examination and amyloid-PET are limited. However, there are important challenges associated with interpreting and integrating plasma biomarker results in clinical practice. This article explores different approaches to interpreting plasma biomarker results in secondary care, important potential sources of uncertainty, and considerations for their clinical application. HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma biomarkers such as phosphorylated tau-217 (p-tau217) offer a promising, accessible alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) for detecting Alzheimer's disease pathology, especially in settings with limited diagnostic resources. Clinical integration of plasma biomarker testing presents challenges, particularly in interpreting results. This includes uncertainties around intermediate results and their role in patient management. Clear frameworks and guidelines are essential to optimize the use of plasma biomarkers, supported by further research and education to ensure effective application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.