Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145123›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025

Caffeic Acid Protects Against Ulcerative Colitis via Inhibiting Mitochondrial Apoptosis and Immune Overactivation in

Minghui Xiu, Botong Li, Li He, Yan Shi, Yongxuan Zhang, Shihong Zhou, Yongqi Liu, Ningbo Wang, Jianzheng He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Therapeutic Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minghui Xiu *College of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Botong Li *Provincial-Level Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine of Major Diseases and the Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in Gansu Colleges and University, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Li HeCollege of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Yan ShiProvincial-Level Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine of Major Diseases and the Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in Gansu Colleges and University, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongxuan ZhangCollege of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Shihong ZhouCollege of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongqi LiuKey Laboratory of Dunhuang Medicine, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-0017
Ningbo WangTibetan Medical College, Qinghai University, Xining City, Qinghai Province, People's Republic of China.
Jianzheng HeKey Laboratory of Dunhuang Medicine, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0397-3698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic intestinal inflammation that is prone to relapse and is difficult to fully recover; therefore, there is a need for safer alternative treatments. Caffeic acid (CA) is a natural polyphenolic compound that has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the beneficial effects and mechanisms of action of CA in UC remain unclear. Purpose: This study evaluated the protective effect of CA against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced intestinal injury in Results: Oral administration of CA significantly reduced body damage in UC flies, improved their survival rate, restored damaged digestion, and improved locomotion. CA supplementation significantly alleviated intestinal damage in UC flies by restoring excretion balance, repairing intestinal atrophy, improving acid-base balance imbalance, inhibiting intestinal structural destruction, inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell death and intestinal stem cell (ISC) excessive proliferation, and reducing the number of harmful bacteria. Mechanistic studies found that CA significantly reduced the expression of Toll and Imd pathway genes (including Conclusion: CA alleviated intestinal damage mainly by inhibiting the Toll and Imd signaling pathways and inhibiting apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial damage. These findings suggest that CA holds promise as a potential therapeutic for UC treatment.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCaffeic AcidsColitis, UlcerativeMitochondriaAdministration, OralAnimalsDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrosophila melanogastercaffeic acidCaffeic AcidsDextran Sulfateapoptosiscaffeic acidDrosophila melanogastertoll and Imd pathwaysulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40145123
PMCPMC11938933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.