ArticleJHLT open2024
Carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels to diagnose hemolysis in patients supported with mechanical circulatory support devices.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biosensors with left ventricular assist devices.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Decreased systemic oxygen delivery derived from gas exchange abnormalities in severe hemolysis complicates patients requiring mechanical circulatory support devices. Severe hemolysis releases free hemoglobin in plasma causing elevation of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels. Hemolysis-induced decline in hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin saturation significantly reduces the arterial oxygen content in blood, reducing systemic oxygen delivery. These patients develop hypoxemia with misleadingly normal oxygen saturation measured by standard pulse oximetry. Methods: Retrospective review of 2 clinical cases reaching carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels > 2% while supported with an Impella device. Results: Case 1. Patient with cardiogenic shock refractory to maximal medical therapy required insertion of Impella device achieving improvement in cardiac output, pulse oximetry, arterial oxygen saturation and systemic oxygen delivery. The device caused significant hemolytic anemia with severe decline in hemoglobin and arterial oxygen saturation with elevation of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels, causing drastic reduction in systemic oxygen delivery despite adequate cardiac output. Device removal reversed severe hemolytic anemia, causing increased arterial oxygen saturation and systemic oxygen delivery despite borderline cardiac output.Case 2. Patient with refractory cardiogenic shock improved after insertion of Impella device. Initial improvement cardiac output and systemic oxygen delivery was negated by hemolytic anemia associated with elevation of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels. Hemolysis decreased by reducing the Impella power output. Carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels correlated precisely with degree of hemolysis allowing to titrate therapy to best systemic oxygen delivery. Conclusions: Monitoring carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin levels readily identifies patients with ongoing hemolysis secondary to invasive supportive devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.