ArticleJHLT open2024
Interindividual response variation to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in heart transplant patients: A secondary meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aerobic Exercise Response Variation and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults with Coronary Heart Disease: An SDir Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Determine whether true exercise-associated interindividual response differences (IIRD) occur in cardiorespiratory fitness as a result of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart transplant patients. Methods: Using data from a recent (2023) meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials representing 296 patients (163 exercise, 133 control), an aggregate data meta-analysis of treatment effects (change outcome differences between exercise and control groups) was conducted as well as an IIRD meta-analysis using the inverse variance heterogeneity model. The primary outcome was cardiorespiratory fitness (VO Results: Statistically significant and clinically important increases equivalent to 14.5% were observed for VO Conclusions: While exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation increases VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.