ArticleJHLT open2024
Intravenous administration of umbilical cord lining stem cells in left ventricular assist device recipients: Results of the uSTOP LVAD BLEED pilot study.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress on cell therapy for skeletal muscle disorders.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation improves survival in advanced heart failure. Despite this, angiodysplastic bleeding complications remain a significant driver of costs as well as morbidity. Mechanisms implicated in post-LVAD implant bleeding include the dysregulation of angiogenic factors seen in this population. The present pilot study evaluates the safety of umbilical cord lining stem cells (ULSCs) in LVAD recipients while exploring any early evidence of efficacy to improve bleeding. Methods: In a 3 + 3 design, 9 patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of ULSCs at escalating doses. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, secondary exploratory outcomes included antibodies against hemoglobin to quantify the amount of blood in stool without the need for dietary restriction. Results: The primary safety and tolerability outcomes were met as no infusion-related adverse events or toxic responses were observed. There was no sensitization after administration of ULSCs as assessed by panel reactive antibody. An increase in angiopoietin-1 levels and a decrease in angiopoietin-2 levels from baseline to 30 days were observed in 4 patients. Quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test suggested a decrease in the mean blood content of stool from baseline to 30 days. Conclusions: In this first-ever IV administration of ULSCs in LVAD patients, infusion was noted to be safe and tolerable and did not cause immune sensitization. Half of the patients were noted to have angiogenic stabilization, and there was a trend toward decreasing amounts of blood noted in the stool, suggesting an early signal of efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.