ArticleJHLT open2024
Multicenter outcomes for ventricular assist device support for failed stage II palliation.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Deterioration in Stage 1 and 2 Single Ventricle Patients Awaiting Heart Transplant: A Single Center Experience.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Ventricular Assist Device Use in Single Ventricle Heart Disease: Current Outcomes and Considerations.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Rehabilitation in children with ventricular assist devices.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular assist device (VAD) use for failed stage II palliation (S2P) is increasing with limited data on outcomes. Methods: To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a multicenter retrospective review of the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network registry. We leveraged the registry to analyze data on the clinical course, complications, and survival of systemic VADs (SVAD) after S2P. Results: We identified 34 patients from 15 centers between 2012 and 2022 implanted at median age of 1.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 0.9-2.7]; 85% had systemic right ventricles and all patients underwent at least one sternotomy. Preimplant, all but 1 patient had an Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile of 1-2, with 62% being on ≥2 inotropes, 50% total parenteral nutrition dependent, 38% mechanically ventilated, and 20% on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the week preceding implant. Device strategy was variable with 70% being on continuous flow devices and the remaining on pulsatile support. Multiple device strategies were utilized in 32% of patients. Median time on VAD support was 74 days [IQR 30-186]. Adverse events were frequent and included infection (47%), strokes (29%), bleeding (26%), dialysis (15%), and respiratory failure (9%). Bleeding complications ( Conclusion: Encouraging clinical outcomes are seen with SVAD use for failed S2P even in the face of frequent adverse events and wide center variability in device strategy. Ongoing multi-institutional collaboration is required to better understand optimal SVAD support strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.