ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
PARAFFIN: A software tool for Pathology Report Automated Feedback for Improved Education of anatomic pathology trainees.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Feedback on the diagnosis and reporting of pathology findings is essential to the training of residents and fellows, but time constraints and other factors can make it difficult to ensure learners are made aware of the outcome of all cases in which they participated. Many trainees attempt to keep track of their cases and later look up final pathology reports in the laboratory information system (LIS); however, this manual and time-consuming process is prone to error and may prevent them from spending time reviewing and learning from these reports. Methods: To address this, we developed a software solution, ( Results: Of the total 51 pathology trainees who were receiving PARAFFIN digests at the long-term follow-up timepoint, 20 responded to our survey. 90% (18 of 20) of respondents report that PARAFFIN allows them to spend more time reviewing the content of final anatomic pathology reports, rather than collecting reports. Trainees report utilizing PARAFFIN for feedback on multiple aspects of pathology reporting, with final diagnosis, wording/style of final diagnostic line, and diagnostic comment being most frequently used. Conclusions: Our automated case feedback solution provides trainees with a record of final pathology reports for cases in which they participated, which allows trainees to spend more time reviewing reports for feedback rather than manually collecting them from the LIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.