Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145056›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2024

Understanding the role of temporary epicardial pacemakers after heart transplantation in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Goyal Umadat, Jennifer Lee, Bria Rice, Shahyar Michael Gharacholou, Parag Patel, Rohan Goswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Goyal UmadatDepartment of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jennifer LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Bria RiceDepartment of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Shahyar Michael GharacholouDepartment of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Parag PatelDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Rohan GoswamiDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients recommend the placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires at the time of surgery. However, there is little data regarding optimal postoperative pacing modality and its implications on intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 187 patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2023 and had postoperative epicardial pacemaker wires placed. The study's primary outcome was to observe the association between pacing modalities and prolonged ICU LOS (greater than 5 days). The secondary outcome was to observe the association between pacing modalities and prolonged hospital LOS (greater than 15 days), readmission within 30 days of discharge, days on inotropic and pressor support, death, high-grade rejection on biopsy, coronary artery vasculopathy at 1 year, primary graft dysfunction, mediastinitis, and development of a malignancy. Twenty-two patients (12%) had their pacing mode turned off at the time of arrival to the ICU, 36 patients (19%) had their pacing mode set to atrially paced, atrially sensed, inhibit, 101 patients (54%) had theirs set to dual chamber paced, dual chamber sensed, triger/inhibit sensed events, and 28 (15%) had theirs set to ventricularly paced, ventricularly sensed, inhibit. No mode of epicardial pacing was associated with an increased ICU LOS, hospital LOS, increased readmission rates, increased short-term adverse effects, increased long-term adverse effects, or increased duration of support with vasoactive medications. Our study demonstrated no significant association between the mode of temporary pacing and LOS or adverse effects after heart transplantation.

Indexed as

bradycardiaintensive care unitlength of staypacemakertransplant

Identifiers

PMID40145056
PMCPMC11935404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.