ArticleJHLT open2024
Application of donor predicted heart mass in heart transplant recipients with left ventricular assist device.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: An association between predicted heart mass (PHM) and post heart transplantation outcomes has been well established; however, there is limited data on the effect of donor PHM on recipients bridged with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). This retrospective observational study seeks to challenge the theoretical benefit of oversizing donor hearts for recipients bridged with LVADs. Methods: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database revealed 10,806 adult patients with 1 of 3 durable LVADs (HeartMate 2, HeartMate 3 [HM3], HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device) between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021. Baseline characteristics were compared between 7 equally sized groups based on donor-to-recipient PHM. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were constructed to evaluate the effect of PHM size-matching on the primary outcome of 1-year post-transplant survival. Further analyses were performed specifically on HM3 patients and with PHM as a continuous variable. Results: Multivariable analysis revealed that severely undersized donor hearts (PHM ratio <0.86) resulted in worse outcomes with respect to 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.30; confidence interval 1.03-1.64, Conclusions: Similar to prior studies on heart transplant recipients, recipients bridged with durable LVAD had worse outcomes when using severely undersized donor hearts. Oversized donor hearts did not significantly improve 1-year mortality, compared to size-matched references. These results were consistent in a subgroup analysis of patients bridged only with HM3 LVADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.