Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145054›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2024

Donor-derived cell-free DNA is a valuable monitoring tool after single lung transplantation: Multicenter analysis.

Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Fatima Anjum, Justin P Rosenheck, Reinaldo Rampolla, Reda Girgis, Howard J Huang, Kathryn Crabtree, Sarah McCormick, Zhiji Zhang, Sangeeta Bhorade and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA testing after lung transplantation in the precision medicine era.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ambalavanan ArunachalamDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Fatima AnjumLewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Justin P RosenheckDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Reinaldo RampollaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Los Angeles, California.
Reda GirgisCorewell HealthCare and Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Howard J HuangHouston Methodist Lung Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Kathryn CrabtreeNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas.
Sarah McCormickNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas.
Zhiji ZhangNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas.
Sangeeta BhoradeNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas.
David J RossNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a nonspecific plasma biomarker for tissue injury that has been validated for monitoring acute rejection (AR) after lung transplantation (LT). However, no studies to date have focused specifically on single lung transplantation (SLT). Herein, we report the performance of dd-cfDNA in detecting AR in SLT from 6 academic centers that implemented this biomarker surveillance in their standard of practice (SOP). Methods: dd-cfDNA test results were corrected for SLT by an algorithm in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory to permit comparison against the same 1.0% threshold used in double-lung transplant. Investigators reviewed patient SOP electronic medical record clinical data to assign test results into cohorts based on clinical allograft health status. To avoid ambiguity in interpretation, samples drawn after a prior AR or infection event or without histopathologic confirmation of AR were excluded from further analysis. Diagnostic cohorts included AR (N=25 samples), healthy (STABLE, N=137), allograft infection (INFXN, N=41), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD, N=7), and "OTHER" types of graft injury (N=12). Results: The study included a total of 257 dd-cfDNA results from 103 SLT patients with one patient excluded due to active cancer. Samples were drawn a median of 233 days (interquartile range: 96-489) after SLT. Laterality for SLT (R vs L) and median dd-cfDNA fraction in AR and STABLE cohort were not statistically different. The median dd-cfDNA fraction was elevated with AR (1.8%) and INFXN (1.1%) vs STABLE (0.46%; Conclusions: These multicenter data, incorporating real-world experiences, support the clinical validity and utility of dd-cfDNA monitoring of SLT recipients. Additional studies of the impact of biomarker surveillance on clinically meaningful outcomes should be forthcoming from robust, prospective, and clinical trials already in progress.

Indexed as

allograft rejectionbiomarkercell-free DNAlung transplantsingle lung transplant

Identifiers

PMID40145054
PMCPMC11935494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.