ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Prospective study on diagnostic efficacy of targeted NGS vs. traditional testing for respiratory infections in myelosuppressed hematology patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Initial Analytical Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR-Based Targeted NGS Assay for Expanded Viral Detection in Clinical Respiratory Specimens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing next-generation microbial diagnostics to optimize infection management in immunocompromised hosts.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- A Nomogram Integrating CD169%, Neutrophil CD64 Index, and C-Reactive Protein for Differential Diagnosis of Mixed Respiratory Tract Infections.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metagenomic and Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnostics: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing Nanopore Targeted Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections: A Comparative Multidisease Approach.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Article
- Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of BALF Microbiota and Clinical Characteristics in Severe versus Non-Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of targeted next-generation sequencing in suspected lower respiratory tract infections of patients with cancer: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- tNGS-based detection of respiratory pathogens in a single center: associations with age, gender, season, and co-infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory tract infections are a significant complication in myelosuppressed hematological patients, especially those with myelosuppression. Traditional microbiological testing methods often show limitations in sensitivity, turnaround time, and cost, making them less effective in this vulnerable population. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) compared to traditional microbiological testing methods (TMT) in detecting respiratory infections among myelosuppressed hematological patients. Methods: This prospective study included 20 patients aged ≥15 years with myelosuppressed hematological disease and respiratory infection, admitted to the hematology department of Fuyang People's Hospital between January and May 2024. Eligible patients underwent both 198-pathogen respiratory tract infection targeted NGS panel (198-pathogen RTI tNGS panel) and TMT. Exclusion criteria included refusal of tNGS or incomplete sputum collection. The diagnostic performance of 198-pathogen RTI tNGS panel was assessed against TMT, with diagnoses confirmed by three independent hematology experts. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and obtained informed consent from all participants. Results: tNGS demonstrated a 100% pathogen detection rate compared to 40% with traditional testing ( Conclusion: tNGS offers superior sensitivity, a broader pathogen detection range, and a faster turnaround time compared to traditional microbiological testing methods. It provides a practical and efficient diagnostic option for respiratory infections in hematological patients, particularly those unable to undergo invasive procedures such as bronchoalveolar lavage. The use of tNGS may enhance clinical management and improve patient outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.