ArticleJHLT open2025
Derivation of a simple risk calculator for predicting clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Absence of Pulmonary Artery Complicated With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension: Favorable Response to Parenteral Therapy.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Development of the pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary vascular resistance, six minute walk distance, B-type natriuretic peptide, age (PVD-B65) risk score for patients with chronic lung disease and pulmonary hypertension.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of Mortality in Pulmonary Hypertension-Associated Chronic Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) portends very poor clinical outcomes, with a median survival time of 1.5 to 2 years. Currently, there is no tool to assess the risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH. Our aim was to derive a simple and practical risk calculator that could be used to predict risk of clinical worsening in patients with ILD-PH. Methods: The INCREASE study was a 16-week study that evaluated inhaled treprostinil in patients with ILD-PH. Baseline data from patients who were randomized to the placebo arm (n=163) and thus untreated with any approved pulmonary artery vasodilators were used to derive a risk calculator. The endpoint of interest was the time to clinical worsening. Stepwise regression, Harrell's c-index, and clinician input were used to derive 2 multivariable Cox PH models from a set of candidate variables. The models were then simplified by applying a point-scoring system to the predictors and refitting with total point score as the covariate. Total point scores were grouped into 3 risk strata (lower, intermediate, and higher). Results: Two versions of a risk calculator were derived. The first was a non-invasive risk calculator which included NT-proBNP and FVC%/DLCO%, and a second adds cardiac index, an invasive parameter, to the above two parameters. For the total point score models, the estimated c-indices were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.783) and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.612, 0.761) for the invasive and non-invasive model, respectively. Conclusion: These two risk calculators provide a simple way to risk stratify ILD-PH patients with clinically useful discrimination. The calculators are easy to employ in clinical practice, since they utilize assessments commonly collected in the care of patients with ILD-PH. Moreover, the calculators can provide clinicians with important prognostic information which can be used to reinforce the benefits of therapy. The risk calculators may also find utility as part of the composite allocation score of ILD-PH patients listed for lung transplant. Future research in this area could include incorporating longer-term outcomes as well as validating the risk models in a separate patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.