Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144810›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

Auckland hearing science discovery and translation in purinergic signaling and inner ear therapeutics.

Srdjan M Vlajkovic, Gary D Housley, Peter R Thorne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srdjan M VlajkovicDepartment of Physiology, Section of Audiology and The Eisdell Moore Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-6844
Gary D HousleyTranslational Neuroscience Facility and Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-588X
Peter R ThorneDepartment of Physiology, Section of Audiology and The Eisdell Moore Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inner ear is a complex sensory organ responsible for hearing and balance. It is deeply embedded in the temporal bone with challenging access for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Stress and injury to the peripheral hearing organ (cochlea) lead to temporary or permanent sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which is the most common form of hearing loss resulting from cellular and molecular damage to the sensory hair cells and primary auditory neurons in the spiral ganglion. These cells cannot regenerate, and their loss leads to hearing disability. Hearing aids can amplify sound and improve residual hearing ability but cannot restore function; therefore, alternative therapies are urgently needed. The pharmacological approach to treating SNHL has been our mainstream research over the past two decades. This review describes our studies investigating the purinergic signalling system in the cochlea and its implications for inner ear therapies. Using animal models of SNHL, we have established that purinergic P1 (adenosine) and P2 (ATP) receptors can prevent or mitigate cochlear injury by reducing cochlear sensitivity to loud sound and improving the survival of sensorineural tissues. Here, we highlight our research investigating the therapeutic potential of P1 and P2 receptor agonists and antagonists in inner ear disorders.

Indexed as

adenosineadenosine receptorsATPcochleaectonucleotidaseshearing lossP2X receptorsP2Y receptorstherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID40144810
PMCPMC11938756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.